SteveMartin wrote:
I am not sure if you are an historian or a publicist. If you are not a publicist, then you have missed your calling. Your ability to distort clear statements and twist historical fact is unparalelled. Tornade, who is a professional spin doctor, applauds your prose and I have to call it prose because it bears little resemblance to factual argument. If you are an historian, then I would roundly suggest a career change, as your displayed understanding of history is rather limited to advancing your own pet theories on how you think things should have been.
You want an historical game ? Frankly, I think you want an unbalanced romp. I guess having a point and sticking to it doesn't count. Perhaps Tornade could explain if this post of yours is spin doctoring or simply avoiding a failed argument, since I'm not sure which to call it. I do know that you are avoiding the issue using insults. If my logic or history is so bad refute it! Don't try to wiggle out of another failed position. |