LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Get Firefox!
Forum Message
Country:CA
Personal Data:Female, born: November 20 1963
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy9Sgmth_rc
Membership19years 148days ago.
Last Login12years 101days ago.
Last Move16years 24days ago.
Tornade is currently Offline!Send a mail to Tornade

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:How to play
Subject:Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Posted by: Tornade - 18years 260days ago.
Message text
southernskies wrote:
ChiggyVonR wrote:
So I ask, is raking a ship modeled correctly?


Website houserule maybe?

"You may only rake at Range=5 or less".


actually 5 hexes seems rather over generous

while there dont seem to be a lot discussion on game scales and such which seems kind of suspect to me...maximum gunnery range is 10 hexes

now i suppose this would be considered EFFECTIVE gunnery range...not simply how far a gun can throw a ball...also since the size of the gun is not really reflected in the range limitations except as gunnery factors it is very difficult to arrive at any kind of determination as to how big a hex actually is
it is possible to extrapolate that since the ships themselves take up two hexes the we could assume that a hex is perhaps one cable in width
(200 yards)...this would account nicely for normal station keeping practices of following at distances of one cable...
making this assumption of course casts a lot of doubt on the fouling rules as presented in WSIM but that is another topic entirely
so if we assume that a hex is one cable across...then that will equate to an effective gunnery range of about 2000 yards which is about right for some of the bigger guns...18, 24 and 32 pounders...raking fire effectiveness dropped off dramatically as the range increased much beyond two cables...so in that context a rake should only be effective at ranges of two hexes or less...not 5 hexes and certainly not 10
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

18years 263days ChiggyVonR [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
18years 263days ChiggyVonR Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
18years 263days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
18years 263days michzeidler Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 18years 262days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 262days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 261days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 261days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   18years 261days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   18years 260days HHornblower Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    18years 260days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
18years 261days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 18years 260days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 259days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 259days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   18years 259days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    18years 255days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  18years 258days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   18years 257days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    18years 257days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
     18years 27days jesmith29 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
      18years 27days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
       18years 27days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Page generated in: 21.875 milliseconds.