LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Anno mille
Forum Message
Country:CA
Personal Data:Female, born: November 20 1963
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy9Sgmth_rc
Membership20years 104days ago.
Last Login13years 57days ago.
Last Move16years 345days ago.
Tornade is currently Offline!Send a mail to Tornade

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:How to play
Subject:Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Posted by: Tornade - 19years 216days ago.
Message text
southernskies wrote:
ChiggyVonR wrote:
So I ask, is raking a ship modeled correctly?


Website houserule maybe?

"You may only rake at Range=5 or less".


actually 5 hexes seems rather over generous

while there dont seem to be a lot discussion on game scales and such which seems kind of suspect to me...maximum gunnery range is 10 hexes

now i suppose this would be considered EFFECTIVE gunnery range...not simply how far a gun can throw a ball...also since the size of the gun is not really reflected in the range limitations except as gunnery factors it is very difficult to arrive at any kind of determination as to how big a hex actually is
it is possible to extrapolate that since the ships themselves take up two hexes the we could assume that a hex is perhaps one cable in width
(200 yards)...this would account nicely for normal station keeping practices of following at distances of one cable...
making this assumption of course casts a lot of doubt on the fouling rules as presented in WSIM but that is another topic entirely
so if we assume that a hex is one cable across...then that will equate to an effective gunnery range of about 2000 yards which is about right for some of the bigger guns...18, 24 and 32 pounders...raking fire effectiveness dropped off dramatically as the range increased much beyond two cables...so in that context a rake should only be effective at ranges of two hexes or less...not 5 hexes and certainly not 10
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 219days ChiggyVonR [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 219days ChiggyVonR Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 219days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 219days michzeidler Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 19years 218days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 218days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 217days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 217days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 217days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 216days HHornblower Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 216days pbass111 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
19years 217days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
 19years 216days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 216days southernskies Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 215days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 215days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 211days Silver Sunchild Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
  19years 214days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
   19years 213days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
    19years 213days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
     18years 348days jesmith29 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
      18years 348days HeadMMoid Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
       18years 348days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Rakes, is it modeled right?
Page generated in: 16.01563 milliseconds.