LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Take a play
Forum Message
City:Argenta IT
Personal Data:Male, born: July 31 1965
Membership21years 214days ago.
Last Login19years 51days ago.
Last Move16years 287days ago.
akaisuisei is currently Offline!Send a mail to akaisuisei

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:Bugs and Improvements
Subject:Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
Posted by: akaisuisei - 20years 264days ago.
Message text
Just a little question about this rule...

Lot of people said it was unrealistic a riggingless ship to surrender... maybe... but let's take a little look at realism...

1 - Riggingless ships turns as fast as rigged ones... mmmm... seems quite strange... where do they find the "power" to turn ?
Sometimes they dropped an anchor (hope the word is right!) to pull the ship and force a turn... but in mid ocean too ??? (maybe a scenario could allow this, but....)

2 - The "support" a ship received from a friendly ship of greater or equal class seems a bit ... strange.... at least for a wargamer...

Just think: imagine 5 infantry regiments deployed together... if one of them is "broken" by enemy fire... it can get a "psycological help" from nearby friendly regiments holding the ground around it... perfectly logical!

...but what if ALL the regiments are broken ??? where do they find such a help ? Who is the soldier who feels "better" when all around him his comrades are scared and running for cover ???

...well... our new rule states just that... if four riggingless ships (virtually helpless and looking for help) are within 10 hexes... they help each other to stay and fight!!!

This is by far a worst rule !

Maybe the rule state so... but I strongly suggest to correct the rule, and allow "psychological help" only from 10 hexes near, friendly ships of equal or better class "able to manouver" .

...my two cents... as usual... (collect them all... it's a step toward a billion! )
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

20years 264days Resisti [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
20years 264days Nick Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
20years 264days Resisti Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
 20years 264days Nick Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
20years 264days TrevorWigwam Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
 20years 264days akaisuisei Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
  20years 264days blert Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
   20years 264days Regis Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
    20years 263days akaisuisei Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
     20years 263days akaisuisei Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
      20years 262days akaisuisei Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
       20years 262days Nick Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
        20years 262days Ensign Re: [WS&IM][BUG] surrender by immobility new rule not working as expected?
Page generated in: 18.35938 milliseconds.