LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Peterborough EN
Personal Data:Male, born: August 17 1964
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.takenimages.com
Membership17years 160days ago.
Last Login5years 149days ago.
Last Move5years 164days ago.
GraysGhost is currently Offline!Send a mail to GraysGhost


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Suggestions, improvement, critics
Subject:Re: Clarification
Posted by: GraysGhost - 14years 130days ago.
Message text
GraysGhost wrote:

In this game:

Here is where my logic took me and why I asked the question:

You have a 4 v 4 game.

Side A has one plane shot down and two retire with Honour. The fourth team member shoots down three of the opposition and thus has a massive points total.

That player now has his engine shot off and leaves the board from the nearest edge – without honour.

Honour matters because retiring with honour means that you are counted as still being on the playing area.

The player who left without honour wins a Strategic Victory and gets a lot of points as under the league victory conditions he has the most points (even if halved) and his side have more planes on the playing area (two with honour retirees).

His opponent who remains on the playing area does not benefit from having shot off the engine and if he is lucky gets two points, probably only one.

Therefore leaving the playing area without honour in large multi-player games may have a direct bearing on the result.

If in the above scenario the player leaving without honour is adjudicated as having zero points then the result is completely different with it being classed as a probable draw.

Therefore with a differentiation between honour being whether a plane is classed as on the playing area at the end of the game or not, how pilots who leave without honour are dealt with matters.

Does my initial request for clarification now make sense and am I misunderstanding something?

TXWard wrote:
Obviously, you must still be misunderstanding something because nowhere is there an indication that a player leaving without honor gets zero points, whether game points (which may impact the League results of the game) or league points (which won't impact the League results of the game).

That is why I asked where you were getting that impression from because it is unfounded based on any of the rules I've read here.


It isn't written, but I'm saying that it should be or that there should be a stiff penalty to prevent people from flying off the side of a game to force a draw or win for leagues.

It is a form of cheating - owing to the fact that the programmers cannot move the playing area as you would for the board game on which our rules are based.

If Mr Hall had written his rules with the expectation that players could fly off the edge of the map then I believe, given his adjudication on honour, that there would have been penalties in the rules.

An omission from the rules doesn't mean that doing something is right, it just means that the game designer didn't think that people would play like that so didn't write a rule stating whether it was acceptable or not.

So what I am asking for is a penalty to prevent people from using a loophole in the rules to their own advantage.

Kit

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

14years 133days GraysGhost [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
14years 133days markrendl Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
14years 132days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
 14years 132days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
  14years 132days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
   14years 132days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
    14years 131days markrendl Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
    14years 130days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
     14years 130days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
      14years 130days BlueDragon Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
      14years 130days markrendl Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
      14years 130days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
      14years 129days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
      14years 130days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Clarification
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

14years 130days Bombadil [BM][OT] long time
14years 130days MajorCrank Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 130days 2BNace Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 130days GraysGhost Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 130days imdog Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 130days athos Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 129days RoyBrown Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 129days Der_Kobra Re: [BM][OT] long time
14years 129days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] long time
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

14years 132days imdog [OT] Happy Birthday Nick!
14years 132days GraysGhost Re: [OT] Happy Birthday Nick!
14years 131days Longneck Re: [OT] Happy Birthday Nick!
14years 130days Nick Re: [OT] Happy Birthday Nick!
Page generated in: 28.51563 milliseconds.