LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Get Firefox!
Forum Message
City:Rochester, NY US
Personal Data:Male, born: December 10 1943
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.boardgamers.org/
Membership20years 289days ago.
Last Login8years 234days ago.
Last Move8years 234days ago.
SirLindsley is currently Offline!Send a mail to SirLindsley

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:Bugs and Improvements
Subject:Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
Posted by: SirLindsley - 19years 199days ago.
Message text
Tornade wrote:
SirLindsley wrote:
Longneck wrote:
Tornade wrote:
SirLindsley wrote:
Game number 13172

Turn 17
Gibraltar surrender by immobility: without rigging and raked.
Turn 21
Orion surrender by immobility: without rigging and raked.

In both of these cases, a friendly ship was within 10 hexes. Isn't that supposed to protect the dismasted ship from surrendering?

Mark


there is something about the supporting ship has to be as big or bigger than the raking ship



Close. The ship within 10 hexes has to be the same or a larger class as the raked ship. And I believe SOL 1 and 2 count as different classes for that. I don't see that game in the list, but that could be the problem.


Must have to be a larger class. There is an equal size class nearby and that didn't protect.

As for finding the game. Go to any game, substitute the game number in the address and go.

Thanks for the help guys,... and gal.



i was able to have a look at the game...and i expect the problem you had was that both of your ships were raked by 1st rates...in the case of your own first rate...it was a smaller ship (tonnage and point value wise) than the raking ship


This is getting confusing. The way I understand it, the raking ship size doesn't have anything to do with it. The supporting ship (friendly within 10 hexes) has to be larger than the raked ship.

Adding to the confusion, my ships were the rakers, not the rakees. I'm ok with the results except I like to know what the rules are and I'm no longer sure. This has not been the first time...
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 200days SirLindsley [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
19years 200days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
 19years 200days Longneck Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
  19years 199days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
  19years 199days SirLindsley Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
   19years 199days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
    19years 199days SirLindsley Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
     19years 199days Longneck Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
      19years 199days Longneck Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
       19years 199days Longneck Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
        19years 198days SirLindsley Re: [WS&IM][BUG] Rake surrender
Page generated in: 10.9375 milliseconds.