Play Wooden Ships & Iron Men boardgame online or challenge other players at different wargames.

Main menu

Home Your Games Your Profile Forum Games Credits Links

Donate FAQ

Leagues

League Index How to Play Leagues People Play Statistics

Gonzaga

Play Gonzaga New!

How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Blue Max

Play Blue Max How to Play Planes & Combat charts Scenarios List Games People Play Statistics Tactical Advice The Big Planes Race

Cartagena

Play Cartagena How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Wooden Ships...

Play Wooden Ships...How to Play Games People Play Statistics Newbies' guide

King Me!

Play King Me!How to Play Games People Play Statistics

VampiRing

Play VampiRing How to Play Games People Play Statistics

Forum Message

Previous message

Post a reply

Next message

City:	Tampa
Personal Data:	Male,
HomePage or other cool site:	http://s3.phpbbforfree.com/forums/squadrons.html
Membership	19years 313days ago.
Last Login	10years 40days ago.
Last Move	10years 40days ago.
UrlicVonFlagg is currently

Message header

Area/Game:	Blue Max
Topic:	Other
Subject:	Re: New Aircraft
Posted by:	UrlicVonFlagg - 19years 102days ago.

Message text

warrax wrote:

Rottillo wrote:

Historically the F2B had two rear guns (as opposed to the single-gun F2A) and it was frequently used and quiet successful (see e.g. http://www.theaerodrome.com/aircraft/gbritain/bristol_f2b.html
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_F.2_Fighter)

As I said, I'm not an expert, so I just reported a comment I read some time ago about this topic....
Just wanted to apologise for the inaccuracy!

I agree, 2 gun Bristol, would be a nightmare for the Germans...
I LOVE the idea of the Austo-Hungarian aircraft and yes, we do need a Sopwith Pup...

Does this game give the Albatros Va's advantage for clearing jams? (rudimentary control lock for straight and level flight, allowing for both hands to clear jams)
Luck to all, Urlic

Back to the messages list

Messages thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

19years 103days	UrlicVonFlagg	[BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	moonglum01	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Panzer	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Bombadil	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	moonglum01	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	moonglum01	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Lord_Biclopse	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Sabelkatten	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Panzer	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	litehoof	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Rottillo	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	warrax	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Oswald Boelcke	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	Rottillo	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	warrax	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 102days	UrlicVonFlagg	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	Tornade	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	Lord Locquax	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	Tornade	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	Panzer	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	Impailer	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	DBurkeG	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 101days	BazJP	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 100days	kduke	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 100days	Dibbs	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 99days	moonglum01	Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft

Next thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

19years 99days	Bramley Bomber	[BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?
19years 99days	pokerguy	Re: [BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?

Previous thread

Posting elapsed time	Posted by	Subject

19years 99days	Bombadil	[BM][BUG] "fired at before" bug?
19years 99days	Dibbs	Re: [BM][BUG] "fired at before" bug?