LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:HONG KONG, ASIA, EARTH, SOL, MILKY WAY HK
Personal Data:Male, born: January 01 1975
HomePage or other cool site:http://https://www.youtube.com/user/imdog
Membership22years 354days ago.
Last Login191days 16h ago.
Last Move1day 16h ago.
imdog is currently Offline!Send a mail to imdog


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Other
Subject:Re: just a reply
Posted by: imdog - 12years 17days ago.
Message text
dcr66 wrote:.

...
1)In the old Squadron Campaign days of over 6 yrs ago, map size used were 10x8 I believe and scenarios are mostly the "boring" category. I caught the tail end of that era and only managed to get into couple series before the organizers disappeared.


I am lucky enough to witness and participate the 3 stage of hurbert quoted and here is some footnot plus my own obseravtion.

Actually from yr1 to yr5 (03-08), There is some small campaign organised by me and die-hard players but it is not very common. Participants response is very good and Coordinator are quite happy to do so.

On the map size, I prefere small (8x10) and (10x10) as it involves more dogfight. I like 8x8 most for dancer type plane (triplane) but it is bad for runner's type plane like Nieuport 28.

I rarely join games on 17x12 as Allies always use to their advantages for more fuel and hunt for German easy prey.

After the introduction of League, organizers like me find it difficult to recruit individual to join games. So we gradually stop organizing games.


2) After those period ended there were another era of competitions (some were team/squadron bases) where someone created web pages to track the progress. Map size were 10x8 as well and usually involve no more than 3 on each side.



Yap, this period is around 6 yrs ago and I am not that active. However I have organized Tomkey with a group of 10-12 pilots so that we held inter-squad campaign regularly, I miss those good old days.


3) After that came Kit (GraysGhost) squadron campaign. Slow play creeps in and people lost interest. Kit's campaign was based on different war periods hence people cannot just go on to next set of games without the first sets being done so experience/casualties can be calculated. It was not easy to have games finished follow by waiting period of 4 weeks. And we have to hunt p.eople down again. Attendance were bad enough for Kit's campaign that anonymous clones had to be used, something that was not necessary in the old days.


Kit's cmpaign mode is the best time of the site I would say. Inter-Squad/ Intra-Squad league competition is common. And team leader exchange info, try around manually managed campaign mode.

But the admin involved is really demanding.


The only games that I created these days are over in WSIM beta. For BM and regular WSIM, I join whatever games I like that in the pending list. As for leagues I don't usually join that early as I try hard to avoid unknown new players who have a great tendency to become automovers especially if they join way too many leagues. Many of them don't realize 5 leagues of the larger types will mean over 100 games. There were mechanisms in the old Nick days to prevent that but I think they stopped working sometime ago.


The league system is both a good and bad design. The mulitiple game play ensure fairness. However joining a league means that you promise game sets from 9 to 25. Which it means if you join 2 league you will need to login everyday to ensure league flow.

The commitment is not easy and new users find there is a sharp learning curve from leisure play to league.

Also the league system is the LAST major site system development, WS&IM is different as it is a seperate project. Later we have Gonzaga but it is also a seperate project too. Nick, the site creator found its very time consuming for admin work and two years ago sell the site to Jim. And then the site keep as is up to now.

I am now discussing with the Management team about the development of the site, hope in 1/2 weeks time we can have some good news for you all.

Cheers

.

--- Message edited by imdog

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

12years 21days wiggervoss [BM][OT] just a reply
12years 20days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
 12years 19days GraysGhost Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 19days markrendl Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 19days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 18days GraysGhost Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 18days markrendl Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   12years 17days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
    12years 17days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 16days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   12years 14days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 18days jtbourke Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 16days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   12years 16days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  12years 18days jtbourke Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

18years 267days BazJP [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
18years 267days docmortand Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 18years 267days Bramley Bomber Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 18years 265days BazJP Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  18years 265days flying_neko Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  18years 265days throbmaster Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 18years 264days Zarby Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  12years 13days BazJP Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
   12years 13days Christie Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
    12years 13days imdog Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

12years 93days wiggervoss [BM][IDEAS] abilities
12years 93days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
12years 92days BlackSheep Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
12years 91days imdog Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
 12years 90days BlackSheep Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
12years 92days markrendl Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
 12years 21days wiggervoss Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
Page generated in: 24.21875 milliseconds.