YouPlayIt!YouPlayIt!LOGIN or Register 
LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
HomeYour GamesForumGames Credits
Preferred site
Get Firefox!
Forum Message
City:Crown Point, IN US
Personal Data:Male,
Membership17years 192days ago.
Last Login11years 332days ago.
Last Move11years 352days ago.
Ogrebait2 is currently Offline!Send a mail to Ogrebait2

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:Bugs and Improvements
Subject:Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
Posted by: Ogrebait2 - 12years 174days ago.
Message text
Longneck wrote:
dcr66 wrote:
BlueDragon wrote:
Hello everyone,
we have a new scenario here on Beta:
Scenario 23 -- Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
This scenario comes from the original rulebook and it has been "translated" for Youplay by Lufbery.

Lufbery will also translate other scenarios from the rulebook in the future (actually he has already sent me another three, but they need some modifications before uploading).

Enjoy!


Serious balancing issues when playing in Advanced rules. I have played 2 sets (4 games) with Andy (Ogrebait2) and Bill (Longneck)

  • Constitution is too strong, its like sending sub chasers against a cruiser.
  • The British needs to have a wind advantage so they can close in on turn 1 effectively
  • The British ships have no enough crew to even bother with boarding actions. Then they cannot get close enough without getting blasted to splinters.


    • I agree. It's hopeless for the British. If they manage to get close enough to fire they're in danger of being swallowed whole by boarding parties.

    Much appreciation to Lufbery. It looks like it's set up right, but it's just unwinnable with Advanced rules. Has anyone played it with Simplified or Basic rules?


    Ditto. Hopelessly unbalanced under any set of rules. Brits need more firepower, crews, and/or ships.
    Messages thread
    Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
    12years 176days BlueDragon New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
    12years 174days dcr66 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
     12years 174days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
      12years 174days Ogrebait2 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
      12years 174days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
       12years 173days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
        12years 173days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         12years 173days dcr66 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         12years 172days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
          12years 147days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
           12years 147days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         12years 171days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
          12years 171days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
           12years 171days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            12years 170days TomSlade Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            12years 170days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            12years 170days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
             12years 170days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
    		All trademarks or tradenames used in this Web site are the property of their respective owners.
    Material may not be republished, nor may content or images be mirrored on another server without written permission.    		 
    Page generated in: 16.99219 milliseconds.