YouPlayIt!YouPlayIt!LOGIN or Register 
LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
HomeYour GamesForumGames Credits
Preferred site
Anno mille
Forum Message
City:Indiana US
Personal Data:Male, born: June 30 1963
Membership20years 205days ago.
Last Login97days 10h ago.
Last Move202days 12h ago.
Longneck is currently Offline!Send a mail to Longneck

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:Bugs and Improvements
Subject:Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
Posted by: Longneck - 13years 130days ago.
Message text
dcr66 wrote:
BlueDragon wrote:
Hello everyone,
we have a new scenario here on Beta:
Scenario 23 -- Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
This scenario comes from the original rulebook and it has been "translated" for Youplay by Lufbery.

Lufbery will also translate other scenarios from the rulebook in the future (actually he has already sent me another three, but they need some modifications before uploading).

Enjoy!


Serious balancing issues when playing in Advanced rules. I have played 2 sets (4 games) with Andy (Ogrebait2) and Bill (Longneck)

  • Constitution is too strong, its like sending sub chasers against a cruiser.
  • The British needs to have a wind advantage so they can close in on turn 1 effectively
  • The British ships have no enough crew to even bother with boarding actions. Then they cannot get close enough without getting blasted to splinters.


    • I agree. It's hopeless for the British. If they manage to get close enough to fire they're in danger of being swallowed whole by boarding parties.

    Much appreciation to Lufbery. It looks like it's set up right, but it's just unwinnable with Advanced rules. Has anyone played it with Simplified or Basic rules?
    Messages thread
    Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
    13years 132days BlueDragon New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
    13years 131days dcr66 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
     13years 130days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
      13years 130days Ogrebait2 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
      13years 130days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
       13years 129days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
        13years 129days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         13years 129days dcr66 Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         13years 128days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
          13years 104days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
           13years 104days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
         13years 127days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
          13years 127days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
           13years 127days Longneck Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            13years 127days TomSlade Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            13years 127days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
            13years 126days Lufbery Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
             13years 126days BlueDragon Re: New scenario: Constitution vs. Cyane and Levant
    		All trademarks or tradenames used in this Web site are the property of their respective owners.
    Material may not be republished, nor may content or images be mirrored on another server without written permission.    		 
    Page generated in: 21.09375 milliseconds.