Forum Message
| Country: |  | | Personal Data: | Male, | | Membership | 11years 122days ago. | | Last Login | 2years 115days ago. | | Last Move | 2years 115days ago. | ecz67 is currently  | |
| Message header | Area/Game: | General | | Topic: | General | | Subject: | blue max ethic | | Posted by: | ecz67  - 11years 6days ago. |
|
|
| Message text hello to everyone!
I'm a newbie playing here from a couple of weeks and with less than 10 games under my belt.
first of all congrats for this wonderful site where is easy arrange a fight with people very experienced and able to show you the hard way how Blue Max should be played.
That said I have a question about the ethic of who propose to play a scenario strongly unbalanced.
why one should create a game unbalanced AND pick the best side? I can imagine that a very experienced player asking for a challange, picks the less favourite side, but I see very often in the scenarios 1/1 ready to be joined only the weak plane is still available.
there are many well balanced scenarios at disposal, I understand one could still decide to play something unbalanced for fun and challenge, but what's the point to take "always" the strong side?
Am I missing something? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
