LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Take a play
Forum Message
Country:CX
Personal Data:Male, born: June 17 1960
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.boardgamegeek.com
Membership18years 132days ago.
Last Login2years 194days ago.
Last Move3years 351days ago.
derekticus is currently Offline!Send a mail to derekticus

Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
1Topic:Bugs and Improvements
Subject:Re: More Riggings in Advanced Rules??
Posted by: derekticus - 13years 266days ago.
Message text
dcr66 wrote:
I heard it from Derek. Karl remembered something similar as well. Aren't the ships suppose to have more riggings in Advanced Rules? The Conquerant should have more riggings in that case.


Hubert, my issue with the French ship CONQUERANT in the old Arbuhtnot scenario is that it has been given less rigging than it deserves - should be 3 rigging sections of 7 each, not 2 of 4 and 1 of 7. This has nothing to do with Advanced Rules OTHER than the fact that the old Arbutnot scenario uses ships that were already upgraded to Advanced Rules specifications even that scenario was in play for Simplified and then Basic rules sets.
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

14years 30days dcr66 More Riggings in Advanced Rules??
14years 29days BlueDragon Re: More Riggings in Advanced Rules??
14years 29days karllagov Re: More Riggings in Advanced Rules??
13years 266days derekticus Re: More Riggings in Advanced Rules??
Page generated in: 25 milliseconds.