LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Rome IT
Personal Data:Male, born: September 06 1971
Membership22years 100days ago.
Last Login5years 154days ago.
Last Move15years 143days ago.
warrax is currently Offline!Send a mail to warrax


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Program code error
Subject:Re: why not "retire with honour" ?
Posted by: warrax - 19years 81days ago.
Message text
Ashtar wrote:
My friends, this is a boardgame , not a wargame, and a very succesfull boardgame to be fair.
It has been designed to roughly simulate two enemy patrols having a chance encounter in no men lands. Point. No missions for instance, for that you should at least modify fuel ratings. But it's very funny and it works very well.

Moreover, in the original boardgame you will not find any trace of the point system used on this site, which has been adapted from some unofficial scoring system used for many players combat in some tornaments. Therefore you should note that:

a) The scoring system is not well suited for 1vs.1 matches. To be honest Blue Max too was not designed for 1vs.1 which indeed are pretty boring.

b) The only reasonable index of your personal success (as in WW1) should be the kills you score and the general behavior of your squad. Count these, do not bother about losing or winning by points.

c) The "retire with honour" concept has been introduced for tournament reasons and to remind people that according to the rules you should try to exit from your side and not from the opposite one. But I suspect the name is a bit unfortunate, since many people seems to have too strong feelings whenever the word "honour" comes into play .

Have fun and see you in the sky


Well said !!! Totally agree !!!

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 85days SkunkGuru [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 85days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 85days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 85days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 85days flying_neko Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 19years 85days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  19years 84days flying_neko Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 84days SkunkGuru Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 19years 82days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  19years 82days sven3012 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   19years 81days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
    19years 81days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
     19years 81days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
      19years 81days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
       19years 81days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
        19years 81days Ashtar Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
         19years 81days warrax Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
         19years 80days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
          19years 76days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 84days wetty11 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 81days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 19years 81days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  19years 81days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   19years 81days darken Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   19years 76days HeadMMoid Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 80days Nick Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
19years 80days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
18years 340days Nick Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
 18years 339days kduke Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  18years 339days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
  18years 339days Wertzz Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
   18years 339days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
    18years 339days moonglum01 Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
     18years 339days Bombadil Re: [BM][BUG] why not "retire with honour" ?
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

18years 339days kduke [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
18years 339days Der_Kobra Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
18years 339days bear23 Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
18years 339days BaluMG Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
18years 338days imdog Re: [BM][OT] Supporting "You Play It"
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

18years 339days Rahab [BM][OT] On vacation
Page generated in: 28.125 milliseconds.